|
I doubt very much that we have
ever sung that last hymn before in this church. It’s a hymn by
Charles Wesley. (All of the hymns today are by Charles
Wesley.) This one was designated for the gathering of
Methodists every year for an annual conference. I think it’s
also appropriate for the closing down of our every four year
General Conference. “And are we yet alive, and see each
other’s face?” (Hymnal no. 553)
I did not know how General
Conference would end. Would there be a split? Would we divide
into two or three different denominations? I am reminded of
the story of the ship that discovered a man alone on a
deserted island. There were 3 huts on the island. He
explained; “This hut is my house. This hut over here is my
church.” Someone asked, “What’s the other hut? What’s the
third hut for?” He replied, “Oh, that’s the church I used to
belong to.”
I did not expect a split of any
kind. I think some of my closest friends expected a
separation. It’s a little like the story about the man who was
awakened by his wife, saying she heard a noise downstairs. He
wearily got up, put on his robe and went down the steps.
Suddenly he found himself staring into the barrel of a gun.
The burglar demanded all the household valuables. Just as the
burglar turned to leave, the man stopped him. “Before you go,”
he said, “I’d like you to come upstairs and meet my wife.
She’s been expecting you every night for 30 years.” Some
people thought a split in the Methodist Church would happen.
Factional church splitting dots
the landscape of church history. Even the Methodist Church
divided at times—once over the slavery issues in the 19th
century and then a little later over the authority of the
bishops. Some delegates see prophecy in a familiar typo for
our denomination. Instead of saying we are the United
Methodist Church, they call us the Untied Methodist
Church.
But there was no split. There
was no serious talk of split or separation. It wasn’t even
close.
Yes, there are some factions
among us. There is a right-wing element—in many cases a
rigid right. And there is a left-wing element—sometimes an
angry left. The right wing wants Biblical literalism and
doctrinal purity. The left wants justice to be the primary
issue before the church. These two ends challenged each other.
Sometimes they did so loudly and articulately. Occasionally I
found myself a bit embarrassed by both sides. Each side won
some and lost some.
But there is a solid, sensible
middle in the United Methodist Church as well. Most of you are
a part of that middle. And the stable, creative middle held.
The middle is strong in the United Methodist Church.
I am a part of that middle. I
suppose you could say I am a little left of the center.
(Surprise, surprise!) I’ll have more to say about that in two
weeks when I mark 40 years since my ordination. But I am
grateful for the spirit in which the General Conference ended,
and I am encouraged about the outlook for the next four
years.
Am I pleased with some of the
decisions made? Yes, I am. Am I disappointed in some? Yes,
that too. But I still love the United Methodist Church. It’s
the best option for me by far.
Let me tell you why. Why do I
remain a United Methodist?
I WAS BORN A METHODIST
First, I was born a Methodist. I
was born, baptized, raised, nurtured and loved in the
Methodist Church. This is my family. One does not abandon his
family when the going gets rough. Will I die a United
Methodist? I am reminded of the story of an Anglican priest
who announced to his Presbyterian colleague, “I was born an
Anglican, I have lived as an Anglican, and I shall die as an
Anglican.” To which his comrade replied, “Good Lord, man, have
you no ambition at all?”
I see no reason why I would not
continue as a Methodist to the end of my days. I am a fully
committed United Methodist, and gladly so. I was born a
Methodist. Today I am one by conviction. This leads me to two
other reasons for my affirmation.
I APPRECIATE DIVERSITY
One of these is that I
appreciate diversity. I thrive on it. On the last day of
General Conference, 95% of our delegates voted “yes” on this
motion:
As United Methodists we
remain in covenant with one another, even in the midst of
disagreement, and reaffirm our commitment to work together for
our common mission to make disciples.
We can be in ministry together,
even in disagreement—even in diversity. The Post-Gazette had
one of the best editorials ever on this subject in their issue
of Wednesday, May 12th. This is what they wrote.
United Methodists voted
emphatically—869 to 41—to go on record as saying that the
church stands as one. This was not a glossing over of
differences, but an effort to keep love and fellowship alive
despite differences… What was done at the United Methodist
Church General Conference in Pittsburgh was encouraging. It
illustrated—as in a marriage troubled by a recurring
argument—that a divorce is not the only remedy in a church
whose members disagree.
I celebrate diversity. Some do
not. I do.
Within that diversity, I affirm
the newest slogan of our church: “Open hearts, open minds,
open doors.” I know that this is both who we are and who
we are becoming, and I know we have some more “becoming” ahead
of us.
Jesus drew the widest possible
circle to include as many people as possible. He included at
least 2 greedy tax collectors whom others hated. He included a
woman who was caught in the act of adultery. He included a man
who was caught up in his own wealth. He included a religious
legalist who sought Jesus by night to get some answers. And he
included a whole boatload of fishermen. (And fishermen are
always notorious liars!) Jesus drew a huge circle. And then he
said, “Anyone who comes to me, I will not cast out.” Or in
another translation, “Anyone who comes to me, I will never
drive away.” (John 6:37)
Some Methodists want to exclude
some persons from the circle. They want to especially exclude
them from the ministry. But remember how Jesus said, “Anyone
who comes to me, I will never drive out.” Diversity opens us
to what this means. I affirm the spirit of diversity in my
church.
Fifty years ago, women could not
be ordained in the United Methodist Church. They couldn’t be
ordained because people believed the Bible said that women
should be silent in church, and never instruct a man. Today we
have hundreds of able, committed, and called women in the
ministry of the United Methodist Church.
I have learned immensely from
the women on the staff here at this church. Often when asked
how to build a staff in a large membership church, I reply,
“Hire a bunch of bright, pushy women and then get out of the
way.” The United Methodist Church lives and thrives on
diversity.
We are doing more and more with
spiritual gifts here. Nothing is more diverse than spiritual
gifts. We are diversely gifted. Spiritual gifts is the way the
church ought to be organized. We are trying to do it. We don’t
have it perfected, but we’re moving on toward perfection. We
try to put the right people in the right place at the right
time for the right reason.
I like diversity. It is a rich
and powerful force for good.
And then there is one more
reason why I love this United Methodist tradition.
WE EMBRACE DISCIPLESHIP
We embrace discipleship as our
mission. Our mission is to form disciples.
In our diversity, some would say
doctrine is central. You must believe certain things to be a
United Methodist. Ministers should take doctrinal tests before
ordination. Ministers should subscribe to the ancient creeds
of the church.
However, since 1996 we have said
that discipleship is the central issue. We take our cue, not
from the world, but from Jesus. It was Jesus who said, “Go and
make disciples” as his final word. It was Jesus who said; “By
this shall all persons know that you are my disciples if you
love one another.” Jesus said, “Not everyone who calls me
‘Lord’ will enter the Kingdom, but the one who does the will
of my Father who is in heaven.” Jesus said, “Every person who
hears these words of mine and does them will be like a wise
person who built a house upon a rock.” And then a very
powerful passage in Matthew 25: Jesus reminds us that God
welcomes into God’s Kingdom those who feed the hungry, clothe
the naked, shelter the homeless, and visit the sick and the
prisoner.
I think we read Jesus correctly.
Forming disciples is our first priority. Doctrines of
classical Christianity are important, but they are of human
construct and thus fallible. There should be a small,
dependable, flexible center. But even then, the doctrines are
not as important as Jesus himself.
A few years ago I was teaching
in a summer United Methodist community. I was teaching on the
book of Exodus about Moses, and how Moses trained disciples in
the desert. I guess I used the word so many times that one
member of the class raised his hand on the last day and said,
“What is this ‘discipleship’ issue you keep talking about?”
His question gave me the opportunity to speak to the issue.
Adam Hamilton is the pastor of
one of the largest and fastest growing Methodist churches in
the country. Last year he said this: “I believe that United
Methodists have an approach to the gospel that 21st
century people will respond to and are, in fact, hungry for,
if only they could be clear about what this is.” I believe we
are clear.
I doubt that Jesus cares a whole
lot about how literally you read the books of the Bible. I
doubt that Jesus cares what you believe exactly about the
virgin birth. I doubt that Jesus cares to what theory of
atonement you subscribe. But I do believe that Jesus wants to
be the master of your soul.
First Christians were called
“followers of the way.” Jesus calls you and me to God’s way of
living. Jesus came to show us what that way is like. That’s
discipleship.
Why do I remain a United
Methodist? First and foremost, this has been and remains my
family. But also I appreciate the possibility of diversity,
and I applaud the fact that we embrace discipleship as our
vision. I believe that these last two pieces are powerful
communicative tools for the 21st century.
Let me close with a quotation
from Nathan Hatch at Notre Dame University. Hatch has been a
Professor of American Church History at the university since
1975. In 1996 he was elected Provost of the university. He is
one of the most influential scholars on the history of
religion in America. Nathan Hatch wrote:
Quite simply, Methodism
remains the most powerful religious movement in American
history. It appeared at the most crucial juncture of our
history and remains the most dramatic movement between the
American Revolution and the Civil War.[i]
And are we yet alive? You bet we
are! Thanks be to God.
[i]
From Martin Marty’s “Context”, March 1, 1994, p. 2
|