|
Who tells the family traditions
in your household? Who is responsible to tell the same
time-tested stories, over and over again? Who shares them and
passes them down to the next generation?
Elaine and I have a couple of
stories in our lives. I like to tell about the time she tried
to make homemade chili from scratch. She bought a bag of
kidney beans to put in the chili, but forgot that they had to
be soaked overnight before they’re used. The beans in the
chili were something like rocks. Over the years we have had a
consistent expression our house that goes something like this:
"Tough beans!”
But she has one on me, too. The
first time I ever ordered quiche from a menu I ordered
“Quickie Lorraine.”
My sister had some recent
dialogue with my mother about her childhood memories. She put
some old pictures and the story together in a little scrapbook
which I now consider more valuable than I might have
otherwise. On my father’s side a distant relative put together
a large book of family history dating back to Germany in the
15th century.
We all have a sacred journey to
unfold. Frederick Buechner writes, “The story that each of
us has to tell is the story of a sacred journey… There is no
place where God speaks more eloquently to us than through what
happens to us, and therefore our stories are sacred stories.”
Who is the tradition bearer in
your household? I had the privilege of seeing the Upper St.
Clair spring musical this past Friday evening. They presented
an exceptionally well done version of “Fiddler on the Roof.”
Of course the first song in that musical play is a song
entitled simply, “Tradition.”
Our family here has a tradition
as well. We call it the Judeo-Christian tradition. The stories
of our forebears whose lives touch ours in a mysterious way
are recounted here, over and over. Someone has written,
“God creates the world, the world gets lost, and for the rest
of time God tries to restore the lost world to Himself. That
is the story of Israel, and it is also the story of you and
me.”
We should know our story. Or at
least we should know a large part of it. Human beings began
writing stories about 1000 BC. Before that it was all oral
tradition. They committed it to memory. They learned the story
and they remembered the story.
Near Marietta, Georgia are the
Kennesaw Mountains and the Kennesaw Mountain battlefield. It
is now a national park at the site of the Battle of Kennesaw
Mountain, which was a major part of the Battle of Atlanta in
the Civil War.
Annually there is a group—mostly
men—who reenact scenes in particular battles from the Battle
of Kennesaw Mountain. They have authentic uniforms and
equipment. There are lots of them. They are organized into the
proper formations of regiments and companies. They fire
cannons and carry out the same maneuvers that were executed
more than 100 years ago.
It may be of some value. It
carries on a tradition and preserves a memory. The battle, of
course, is perfectly predictable. Each battle is always the
same. The outcome of the story is already known. The victor
must be victorious, and the vanquished must lose. We reenact
it to tell the story—to remember it and to teach it to others
so that they can have the same tradition.
Someone has said that the
Christian faith is something like this. It is a sort of
reenactment of ancient battles. The lessons are already set.
We, the grownups, always know the outcome. We know the end of
the story.[i]
I read so much today about how
we are losing track of our Story. A huge number of
young adults under the age of 35 seem to have no Christian
memory. And the number is apparently growing.
A little girl came to her mother
and said, “Mama, you know that vase which you told us has been
passed down from generation to generation?” The mother
acknowledged that she did know the vase. Continued the child,
“This generation just dropped it.”
I came across a very strong
statement in “Homiletics” magazine. This may be a little
extreme, but it illustrates the point.
…When it comes to a knowledge
of our stories, the current generation, as well as the one
that preceded it, is dumber than a sack of hammers. We may
have the air of serious students of the Bible, but as they say
in Texas about cowboy wannabes: “Big hat, no cattle.”[ii]
As I say, that’s a little
extreme. But it makes an important point.
Jay Leno went into his Tonight
Show audience one night. He asked who could name one of the
Ten Commandments. There was a period of silence, and then
finally someone said, “God helps those who help themselves.”
Then he asked if anybody could name one of the original
apostles of Jesus. There was no answer. He asked if anybody
could name the Beatles, and instantly there was a response:
“George, Paul, John and Ringo.”
A ten-year-old, under the
tutelage of her very religious grandmother, became quite
knowledgeable of the Bible. Then one day she floored her
grandmother with this question: “Grandma, which virgin was the
mother of Jesus? Was it the Virgin Mary or the King James
Virgin?”
I’m talking about basic stuff
here, not all the details. Pittsburgh Theological Seminary
requires of its graduates something called a “Bible content
exam.” It is very comprehensive. I have seen the test and I am
not sure that I could do real well on it at times. It is given
in the belief that graduating seminary students should know
the content of the Bible.
What about you? Do you know the
creation narratives of Adam and Eve and Cain and Abel? Do you
know the story of Noah? (A recent survey pointed that at least
20% of all people asked, believed that Noah’s wife was Joan of
Arc.” Do you know the stories of Moses? I keep trying to get a
book published of these stories—not so much for the royalties,
but to get the story out. The writer of Exodus was an
excellent storyteller. He was highly skilled. Do you know the
stories of Moses?
Do you know the stories of
Jesus? Not the folklore, but the real story? In so many places
I read and hear about the decline of Biblical literacy. George
Barna writes, “Fewer
and fewer people have any clue what the Scripture really
teaches—as opposed to what they feel it should teach.”[iii]
Let me use the current “Passion”
movie as an example. I saw it on the Friday after it first
came out—the Friday after Ash Wednesday.
I agree with Chris Whitehead
that the Garden of Gethsemane scene was very real and seemed
totally consistent with what I know of the story of the
Scriptures. Jesus went through a time of agony, wishing that
he did not have to die. Then he surrendered to the will of
God. When he emerged from the prayer time, he was soaking wet
from perspiration. That seems to me to be pretty descriptive
of the picture that I have in my mind as I read the stories of
the prayers of Jesus in the Garden of Gethsemane.
But what about the whipping
scenes? The movie is two hours and five minutes in length.
Fully 25% of it is spent in the beating of Jesus. I was told
to read the Passion stories before I went, and then see the
movie. I did just the opposite; I saw the movie and then read
the stories.
I read the stories in John. It
says in John’s gospel that Pilate ordered Jesus whipped, then
the soldiers placed a crown of thorns on his head and a purple
robe on his back, and spit on him. Then Pilate took him back
out to the crowd. The crowd continued to insist that Jesus be
crucified. The gospel writer says, “Pilate caved in to their
demand. He turned him over to be crucified.” (See John 19 in
“The Message.”) Other gospels simply say, “Pilate ordered
Jesus whipped and then taken out to be crucified.”
The brutality pictured in the
movie might have been there. But it is not defined in the
Biblical narrative. I am in no way demeaning the suffering
that Jesus endured for us on the cross. I am not denying the
great love he had for us and has for us.
But does the movie teach
Scripture? Or does the movie present what Mel Gibson wants to
believe happened? Is it necessary to beat and slash and rip
the human body of Jesus to a pulp in order for Jesus to be my
Savior? I don’t think so.
We need to know our stories. But
we need not be influenced by images.
We need to elevate our
familiarity with the story. This is why Martin Luther put the
Bible back into the hands of the common people. This is why we
tell the stories over and over again to children in Sunday
School. We repeat them several times in the early childhood
and elementary years. This is why we invite you to read along
in the Scriptures with us in worship. This is why we pass out
Bibles to the third graders every year. This is why we have an
open Bible in the center of our worship every Sunday. This is
why we will encourage you to participate in Disciple Bible
Study again this coming September. This is why we read and
listen to Scripture in our CBS groups. If there is no desire
to really “study” the Bible, we should at least read it and
share what it seems to be saying to us.
Use every means you can to get
in touch with the Great Tradition.
Our mission is to form Christian
disciples, not Bible scholars. I’m not asking you to be
thoroughly familiar with everything in the Bible. But we need
to know our tradition. Otherwise we are easily convinced of
some things that are not there.
And it won’t be just the
children who make the humorous mistakes. One adult reported
that when Mary heard that she was to be the mother of Jesus,
she went off and sang the Magna Carta. Another said that he
thought a republican was a sinner first mentioned in the
Bible.
Listen to this statement: “Tell
the unrivaled story of God in language contemporary culture
can relate to and absorb, while embracing the heritage of
faith, which has anchored believers through all generations.”
That’s what we need to be about.
This is precisely why fresh
translations and paraphrases have been published through the
years. One of the first paraphrases for me was the one by J.
B. Phillips. It is still in common usage and still a great
rendering. Then came the Good News Bible. Next came the Living
Bible. Today it is “The Message,” as paraphrased by Eugene
Peterson.
I am reading a classical
devotional book right now in my daily devotional time. It is a
book by Oswald Chambers called My Utmost for His Highest.
Chambers died in Egypt in 1917 during World War I. The family
put the book together after his death.
A few years ago, someone
re-wrote Chambers’ book in contemporary language. Instead of
the language of 1917, it was the language of 2004. In that
format, the reading is very helpful to me. Ironically,
however, all the Scripture references are still in the King
James Version. So what I do is go to “The Message” to clarify
and to meditate upon the Scripture passages.
If you long to be a more mature
believer, if you long to know the stories of Abraham and Moses
and Jesus, if you want to have the richness of your faith
heritage rejuvenated in your soul, start now. Start anywhere.
I suggest you start by reading the Gospels. And in particular,
I suggest you read the Gospel of Mark. Then perhaps Luke’s
gospel, because Luke has some of the most wonderful parables
that Jesus told. Then go to the Book of Exodus. Read the story
of Exodus, the stories of Moses. Then maybe go and read
Genesis, especially the first 12 chapters. Get the tradition
in front of you. Read, enjoy, and celebrate the tradition that
defines your history.
Remember! The Tradition, our
Tradition, our Faith Tradition. It is still the
greatest story humanity has ever known.
[i]
Thanks to Dean Reynolds, Christ Church Cathedral, Houston,
Texas, in a sermon from June 11, 2000
[ii]
“Homiletics” magazine, February 2004, p. 48
[iii]
From the United Methodist Reporter, January 30, 2004 on
the Faith Focus page
|